GEIST:UPC Searchengine

UPC_CFI_318/2024

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. ASUSTek Computer Inc., Arvato Netherlands B.V., Digital River Ireland Ltd.

Date
2026-11-06
Division
Milan (IT) Local Division
Type of action
Infringement
Language
EN

Metadata

Case IDUPC_CFI_318-2024-0e1d78d28d06
Case number
Registry numberUPC_CFI_318/2024
Order reference
Keywords
Headnotes

Documents and full text

Extractor: pypdf | Pages: 73

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE MILAN LOCAL DIVISION UPC CFI no. 318/2024, no. 730/2024 DECISION delivered on 6 November 2026 HEADNOTES: 1. Article 32 UPCA does not confer a general and abstract jurisdiction to certify that a patent is standard-essential vis-à-vis a standard-setting organisation or the market as a whole. Neither Article 56 nor Article 64 UPCA provide a basis for a principal de claration of essentiality with erga omnes effect. The UPC may, however, determine essentiality as an incidental issue insofar as necessary to decide an action for infringement or a declaration of non-infringement. That assessment concerns whether implementation of the specific standard necessarily entails implementation of the asserted patent claims. 2. Competence over a claim against an intermediary must be ...